What would happen in this scenario?
Say a US plane is flying in Asia and begins having engine problems. The pilots brush it off and try to correct the issue with their training. However, the problem worsens and they know an emergency landing is necessary otherwise the flight could be doomed. However, there's a problem. The only airport closest for emergency landing is Pyongyang International Airport. What would the pilots do in this scenario? Would they actually land in Pyongyang or keep going until they get to somewhere different? Just a weird curiosity I had.
Firstly, pilots would never ever "brush off" an engine problem. However, assuming they're as stupid as you imagine they are of course they'd land in Pyongyang.
They land at Pyongyang.
Skin tin ticket… In that order, always.
Your first priority is to save lives.
Your second priority is to save the aircraft.
Your last priority is to save your license.
Really, it's not as big of a deal as you might think. The United States has shot down more civilian airliners than North Korea has.
If it were the only option, the pilots would request permission to land at Pyongyang. In all probability, the plane would be allowed to land to avoid a major international incident, rather than allowing it to crash or shooting it down. Given the close proximity of South Korea and China, and the fact that US planes can't enter DPRK airspace, it is unlikely this scenario would ever occur.
No one flies anywhere close to all of North Korea, so your scenario will not happen.
They'd declare an emergency and land in Pyongyang if that truly was the only suitable airport they could reach.
As a one time anti-submarine aircraft carrier pilot for the US Navy I often flew off the coast of the Soviet Union. And the only suitable emergency field was at Vladivostok a major submarine base (and airport) for the Soviet Union.
Fortunately none of us ever had that emergency. But imagine it if I had had to land my anti-submarine aircraft on the Soviet Union airfield where they kept their most advanced submarines in their pens.
My crew and I would have been jailed and interrogated for years. And my aircraft and its anti-sub detection devices would have been pulled apart and analyzed down to the gnat's eyetooth.
Same thing for your imaginary aircrew and aircraft landing on Pyongyang.
Your scenario is NOT happening. NK is a no fly-over country.
International Law allows for an aircraft with a declared emergency (<Mayday> or <Pan Pan> ) to be afforded all possible assistance, and in this case, the authorities at Pyongyang would probably permit the aircraft to land, though the aircraft can expect to be escorted in by a couple of MiGs. If the aircraft is military it would certainly be impounded, stripped and very thoroughly inspected - as in the case of the EP-3E damaged in a collision with a Chinese interceptor and had to put down on Hainan in April 2001.
Firstly, pilots would never ever "brush off" an engine problem. However, assuming they're as stupid as you imagine they are of course they'd land in Pyongyang.
First… A pilot DOES NOT just "brush off" engine problems. Second… It's highly unlikely that an American aircraft would be flying on any sort of route where the only safe landing place would be an airport in North Korea.
Well, that will never happen except in the imagination of a retarded child so I will not bother to answer this utterly rubbish question!
- Would flying between 40k and 45k miles a year make me a frequent flyer? The past few years I have kept track of the amount of (real) miles I have flown -- I say real miles to distinguish them from airline miles, because I don't always fly with the same rewards program -- and the average is about 40 to 45k miles a year. In everyday conversations, would it make sense to consider myself a "frequent flyer," or is that only for people who fly like 100k plus every year?
- Why do so many bad things happen on United Airlines? Whenever something bad happens on an airline, its almost always on United. Like today, when some woman fat-shamed her seatmates. United airlines has also kicked many autistic passengers of planes because they were "disruptive". Why is United Airlines like this? This doesn't happen as much on American Airlines.
- Airplane mechanics: why would a plane have to burn off fuel before landing? My local news just talked about a flight having to return to the airport after "mechanical issues with the nose gear", but then it said that the plane had to circle the airport for about an hour "ro burn off enough fuel for landing". I'm curiois why would it have to burn off fuel instead of just landing? Especially if it turned around for mechanical issues.
- At an airport, would I have to take out small electronics out of my luggage during X-Rays? I have a DS and a Nintendo Switch in my bag and it would be quite the ***** to take them out and put them back in.